Ed Woodward admits United failed David Moyes - inside the missteps and what changes now

Ed Woodward has acknowledged that Manchester United failed David Moyes during the turbulent 2013-14 season, a rare admission that reopens a decisive chapter after Sir Alex Ferguson stepped down. Back then, the club stumbled in the market, lurched between ideas, and paid the price with results and identity. Supporters see the confession as overdue but telling. It underscores why United are rebuilding their football structure under INEOS, with a modern executive team and clearer lines of responsibility. The lesson is simple: alignment between boardroom and touchline must be non-negotiable if United are to stop repeating the same cycle.

Context: The 2013 handover from legendary manager Sir Alex Ferguson to David Moyes exposed deep structural gaps at Manchester United. The club missed key targets in the summer of 2013, overpaid late for Marouane Fellaini, and lacked a seasoned sporting structure. Moyes was dismissed in April 2014 with United headed for seventh, their lowest Premier League finish at the time. Ed Woodward remained in charge of football decisions for years afterward and left the club in 2022. In 2024, the INEOS era began reshaping football operations, installing a modern executive framework focused on recruitment, strategy, and accountability.

🚨 JUST IN: Ed Woodward accepts now that the club failed Moyes. Back then a disconnect between the men was clear - ‘either he’s a genius, or a f***ing clown,’ said Moyes privately. Woodward had no compunction in sacking Moyes in April 2014 but it was what happened next that

@UtdXclusive

Impact Analysis

Woodward’s admission matters because it validates what many inside the game saw in real time: United’s post-Ferguson reset relied on hope rather than structure. A club that had dominated under a once-in-a-generation manager tried to copy the output without rebuilding the process. The 2013 market became a case study. Failed pursuits of top midfielders, the late Fellaini deal, and no technical buffer between manager and board created a vacuum. Moyes arrived into a dressing room transitioning in age profile and status, asked to rewire an institution while juggling recruitment with little specialist support. That is rarely survivable.

On the pitch, United dropped to seventh with a negative goal difference trend, a halting build-up, and minimal chance creation against compact blocks. Off it, the churn began: Van Gaal, Mourinho, Solskjaer, and Ten Hag all inherited legacy gaps, with wage commitments and amortization rising faster than on-field cohesion. The biggest cost was strategic drift. Without a clear football department, each manager tried to retrofit his philosophy onto an inconsistent squad.

The admission lands as INEOS retools the model. A defined CEO for football, a technical director, and a true recruitment pipeline aim to flip the pyramid: idea first, talent second, fees third. If backed by discipline on exits, age profiles, and set-piece and out-of-possession coaching detail, United can finally turn apology into advantage.

Reaction

Fan response was instant and fierce. Many called Woodward the central reason United lost a decade, arguing that his learning curve came at the club’s expense and left scars that INEOS must now heal. The phrase “put us back 10 years” cropped up repeatedly in different words. Others questioned the timing, asking why this confession surfaces now and what it changes for the current season. A pocket of supporters pivoted the conversation toward perceived double standards in coverage of rival financial cases, venting that United’s missteps are dissected while other clubs dodge scrutiny.

Some voices, while angry, took a pragmatic line: acknowledgement is fine, but only structural reform matters. They want fewer vanity signings, more clarity on profiles, and a manager protected by a professional recruitment spine. A few noted that late contrition does not repair the 2013-20 turbulence or the sunk costs on fees and wages. Still, the dominant mood is not nostalgia. It is fatigue with error and urgency for competence. Fans will judge the new regime by windows, minutes for smart signings, and the disappearance of scattergun briefings, not by mea culpas.

Social reactions

Why did the club fail Moyes? The club failed by getting Moyes more like. Going back then Jose ought to have been hired for 2-3 seasons, squeeze a couple more trophies out of that team, then followed by a rebuild under a younger manager. Moyes was the wrong step from the start.

RC83 (@CRaymond83)

Woodward is an even bigger cunt than the Glazers. They shouldn't have let him do a job that he knew nothing about but they did and he should have recognised his own shortcomings and hired competent people to run the football. Instead, he went on a 10 year ego trip and ruined us🐀

Anthony Falvey (@TheFalve)

Have you just worked that out!!!!

Graham Pitt (@grahamhpitt)

Prediction

Short term, the admission will fuel internal alignment. Executives know the room. Any flirtation with ad hoc decision making will be checked by the memory of 2013. Expect tighter target lists, fewer last-week scrambles, and clearer role definitions. Contracts should be staggered to avoid age cliffs, with resale value built into the squad map. United will prioritize a press-resistant midfielder, an athletic center back comfortable high up the pitch, and a wide forward who adds high-value shots, not just take-ons. That trio of profiles has been missing in sync for years.

Medium term, INEOS will harden governance. A football board that signs off on strategy, not just spend, will mean fewer manager-specific detours. Data will filter options, but the final decisions will align to a club game model that outlives any coach. If executed, the mood music around Old Trafford shifts from crisis management to compounding gains. Set pieces and transitional defense will be used as force multipliers to stabilize results while the talent curve rises.

Long term, this becomes a cultural reset. The club will talk less, brief less, and show more. If the summer windows reflect discipline and the academy pipeline remains active, United’s annual floor should rise to Champions League level, with title contention returning when the squad hits its athletic peak.

Latest today

• Asensio ruled out with fever - Jimenez to start at right back for Madrid
• Zlatan Ibrahimovic's stark verdict on Man United's standards at Carrington resurfaces
• Alexis Sanchez’s instant regret at Man United resurfaces - a costly lesson from 2018
• United's 804 right-backs claim and the £50m call: revisiting the Wan-Bissaka pick

Conclusion

In 2013, I remember the surreal late August calls, everyone tracking flights and chasing whispers as United’s window frayed. It felt improvised because it was. Woodward’s admission closes the loop on that feeling. Moyes was asked to replace a legend without the scaffolding a modern giant needs. Few could have succeeded. The consequences rolled for years as each new coach inherited a puzzle missing the corner pieces.

The way out is not complicated, but it is hard: pick a football idea, hire to it, and live with it when the first storm hits. United finally have a structure that can protect the idea. If the recruitment calendar stays early, if exits are decisive, and if the team’s physical profile rises across the back line and midfield, the club stops reliving the same mistakes. Apologies belong to the past. The only thing that counts now is the next smart decision, repeated over many windows, until Old Trafford stops waiting for a miracle and starts trusting a method.