Rúben Amorim praises Benjamin Šeško's fast return - rival view says sharpness still weeks away

Rúben Amorim publicly noted Benjamin Šeško’s quick return to action, saying the striker was managed for 70 to 75 minutes, fought hard and will improve quickly. The remarks ignited debate around the player’s readiness and end product. From a rival perspective, the workload control is smart, but his timing and decision making still looked a step off. Fans split between optimism and frustration, pointing to missed chances and calling for reinforcements. For now, Šeško is back, minutes are being built sensibly, but the edge that terrifies defenders is not quite there. Expect a measured ramp up rather than instant fireworks.

In recent public remarks, Rúben Amorim assessed Benjamin Šeško’s performance and fitness management, stressing a pre-planned 70 to 75 minute limit to control his return. Amorim praised the striker’s work rate and predicted further improvement with minutes. The conversation around attacking options also swelled as academy names like Jack Fletcher and Shea Lacey drew attention following senior involvement, while pundit analysis elsewhere highlighted decisive moments in a separate matchday. Against that backdrop, the talk around Šeško’s sharpness and readiness became a focal point for supporters and rivals alike.

🚨🗣️ Rúben Amorim: "Benjamin Šeško is gonna improve a lot. He’s returned very fast. The idea was 70, maybe 75, minutes. We are trying to control everything. He did well, he fought a lot and he is going to do well."

@UtdXclusive

Impact Analysis

From a data-led rival view, the biggest impact of Šeško’s controlled return is psychological rather than tangible output in the immediate term. His movement patterns are intact - he still attacks the front post well and stretches the last line - but a returning forward’s first touch under pressure and finishing rhythm typically lag match fitness by 3 to 5 games. That gap shows up in micro-moments: half-second delays on lay-offs, slightly mistimed runs against the offside trap, and finishing choices skewed toward power over placement.

Last season’s profile still tells you why coaches invest the minutes. Šeško offered strong non-penalty chance quality, aerial presence, and pressing intensity that suits high-tempo systems. Even without quoting narrow numbers, his shot quality trends comfortably above average for a young 9, and his off-ball work creates secondary chances for onrushing midfielders. But conversion out of the gate after an interruption rarely matches underlying xG. Historically, strikers at his age and build take a few weeks to re-sync hip-shoulder mechanics and re-establish finishing angles.

Net impact short term: he occupies center backs and helps territory control, yet opponents will still fancy their duels if they crowd his first touch and deny the near-post stride. Long term: assuming minutes ramp smoothly, his gravity returns and the attack regains vertical punch. For rivals, this is the window to press him aggressively and force decision-making before the sharpness fully returns.

Reaction

Social reaction split fast. Some leaned into the optimism, echoing the idea that controlled minutes are the right path and that Šeško will inevitably catch fire with continuity. Others fixated on wastefulness, asking why clear looks weren’t buried and whether the team needs more cutting edge up front. One fan flatly said he needs to stop wasting chances, another argued he should have scored, and a third called for new signings to raise the ceiling around him.

Meanwhile, the wider matchday discourse drifted to other storylines: praise for a youngster’s debut, congratulations from club legends, and pundit takes highlighting two moments of class elsewhere determining a result. That context matters - when a squad leans on academy energy and tight margins, a marquee forward is judged on ruthlessness. A stray comment even tried to reorder a midfield pecking order involving names from different leagues, which shows how chaotic and agenda-driven timelines get after mixed performances.

Bottom line on the sentiment map: cautious optimism among those who value process and planned workloads, louder short-term frustration from fans who want chances finished, and a persistent drumbeat pushing for another attacker. The consensus center is thin, and that usually means the next 2 to 3 appearances will swing narratives sharply in either direction.

Social reactions

He is terrible. Surely Amorim says this to please the management as he is a management pet.

IntheShadow (@zzzIntheShadow)

can he stop wasting chances tho?

unrulylois (@Roadtorichuncle)

Should've scored yesterday though

Matthew Wyn Morris 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 (@mwmorris1997)

Prediction

Short term, expect a conservative ramp: 60 to 75 minute stints with substitution around the same window Amorim referenced, prioritizing stable high-intensity runs over sheer volume of touches. He likely needs 4 to 6 matches to iron out timing in the box and restore the calm finishing tempo that marked his best spells last season. Rivals will compress space into his feet and bait early shots from poor angles; the onus is on his teammates to supply early crosses and cut-backs to simplify decisions.

If a goal arrives in the next two fixtures, narratives will swing to the step-change story and the system fit. If it doesn’t, calls to add one more forward will escalate and usage could pivot to a horses-for-courses approach, pairing him with a channel runner to free him from back-to-goal wrestling. Either way, the staff will keep minutes controlled to avoid setbacks - the bigger aim is March-April sharpness rather than February headlines.

On the market noise, if form normalizes, speculation will resurface because his profile hits the modern 9 checklist: height, mobility, pressing output, and improving link play. Price talk rises only if the finishing streak returns. Until then, defenders will keep testing his first touch and physicality, knowing this is the best time to face him.

Latest today

• Manchester United push for Antoine Semenyo as Amorim’s ideal wide weapon
• Roma table €40m package to sign Joshua Zirkzee from Man United
• Beccacece’s center-back hierarchy sparks Ecuador debate: who follows Pacho, Hincapié and O...
• Alexander Isak injury scare - Newcastle braced for months out in worst-case scenario

Conclusion

Amorim’s line is clear: planned minutes, steady progress, no shortcuts. That approach is sensible, but from a rival standpoint, the fear factor isn’t back yet. You can still crowd his first touch, force him down the weak side, and win second balls off his chest control. The ball-striking will come - it usually does for strikers with his underlying shot quality - but there is a visible lag between match fitness and penalty-box composure after time out.

I watched him live last spring and the difference when he’s fully tuned is obvious: earlier separation on near-post runs and less telegraphed finishes across the keeper. He’s not there yet. Expect incremental gains, one high-quality chance per outing, then the finishing to normalize. If he converts soon, rival setups will adjust deeper; if not, the press will continue to squeeze him. For now, opponents should be bold. This is the window to take points while he rebuilds rhythm.