Paul Scholes challenges Ruben Amorim’s fit at Man United as debate erupts over club direction

Paul Scholes publicly questioned whether Ruben Amorim understands Manchester United, saying he is not the right man. The remark landed hard in a fanbase already split on direction and style. Some supporters backed Amorim’s project and asked for patience under INEOS. Others sided with Scholes, citing stubborn tactics and a lack of academy integration. Data points surfaced too, with Bruno Fernandes leading Premier League chance creation across five seasons, hinting that structure and finishing, not creativity, could be the problem. From my time in the game, I know comments from club legends echo in the dressing room. This one will sting.

Scholes made his remarks during a football podcast appearance, and the discussion quickly spread across mainstream platforms. The timing is sensitive: United are in a transition phase under INEOS, bedding in a coach known for a back three with aggressive wing backs and positional rotations. Supporters highlighted a recent home record that includes just one defeat in the last ten, while performances away from Old Trafford remain more volatile. The wider context is a squad rebuild that is still incomplete and a club attempting to impose a long-term identity after years of short-cycle resets.

🚨🗣️ Paul Scholes on Ruben Amorim: "I don't think this manager gets this club full stop. I just don't think he's the right man." [@goodbadftblpod]

@UtdXclusive

Impact Analysis

When a club legend questions a head coach’s suitability, it can reshape the entire week. For the manager, the challenge is authority. Amorim’s game model demands synchronized movements from the back three, wing backs pinning width, and advanced midfielders timing third-man runs. That takes months of repetition. Public doubt from a figure like Scholes can make players second guess the process, even subconsciously, and it feeds a media loop that tests discipline on matchday.

For the board, this puts the spotlight back on alignment. INEOS hired a coach known for a defined identity. You either back that identity through recruitment and time, or you pivot quickly and accept the sunk cost. Straddling the middle rarely works. A fan cited that United have lost only one of the last ten at home, which squares with what I’ve seen: the structure holds better at Old Trafford, while away fixtures expose the build-up under pressure and defensive transitions when wing backs are caught high.

Data matters here. Bruno Fernandes sits atop chance creation across the last five Premier League seasons, which suggests supply exists. The drop-off looks more like box occupation and finishing consistency rather than creativity. In my playing days, these moments demanded calm heads. If the staff can weaponize Scholes’s criticism as a siege mentality, they’ll squeeze out points while the build settles. If not, this becomes noise that turns into doubt, then into results.

Reaction

The fan response split along familiar lines. One camp echoed Scholes, arguing Amorim has not grasped the club’s identity and pointing to a perceived reluctance to integrate academy talent. Another camp pushed back hard, noting his track record before arriving and insisting ex-players talk down the current regime too quickly. I saw supporters remind everyone that United have dropped only one of the last ten at home, asking why a single setback triggers open-fire punditry.

There was also accountability talk directed at the hierarchy. Several voices said this is as much on INEOS as on Amorim: they knew his system, knew he prefers a back three and requires specific profiles at wing back and in the half spaces. If you appoint that coach, you must resource that plan. Others shifted the focus to the squad, calling for at least four to five additions, specifically a midfielder with range, a left wing back, and a commanding center back to stabilize the first pass under pressure.

Side notes added texture to the mood. A stat thread on Bruno Fernandes leading league chance creation painted a different picture of the attack’s issues. A separate viral image of Karim Benzema in a vintage Eric Cantona shirt added nostalgia and a touch of irony on a day dominated by the club’s past judging its present. The common thread across the replies: fatigue with public division. Fans want unity, or at least quiet, while the team builds.

Social reactions

How do this help Manchester United right now??? All it does it divide the fan base at a time when we need everyone pushing in the same direction to get the club back to where it needs to be.

Matt Brown (@MattBro08766762)

These are one of the pressures we are talking about, we are the ones who create this pressure on our players, managers board etc which is not good, have you a Liverpool City arsenal legend criticize there players, managers, boards, like this,

Legend (@Legend710283)

We still need atleast five new players midfielders left wingback a good cb only then we can tell if this manager is good to stay we are playing with old team n most of the match’s only mbeumo was a regular starter from new signings

Aqeel wains (@Aqeel364767095)

Prediction

Short term, expect Amorim to double down on fundamentals. Training will emphasize exit routes from the back three, quicker weak-side switches, and timing of runs beyond the last line to sharpen box presence. Team selection may tilt toward trusted lieutenants to mute volatility. If results steady, the narrative shifts from Scholes to the table, and the storm passes.

Medium term, the board faces a binary choice. Back the model with the right profiles or change course. My read: INEOS will hold their nerve for now. They made a long-term bet and will not want to blink at the first public flare-up. Expect targeted moves in the next window: a left-sided center back comfortable stepping into midfield, a wing back with recovery pace and final-ball quality, and a rotator in midfield who can carry pressure off Bruno while improving rest defense.

Worst-case scenario is a results dip away from home that drags the club into a chase. That is when the outside noise becomes inside noise. Best case is incremental improvement and a clean run of two months that puts top-four pace back on track. Most likely: a grind. Marginal gains, tighter game states, and a squad slowly molded to the manager’s image.

Latest today

• Manchester United academy winger Sam Mather set for January exit amid Turkey, Germany and...
• Pep Guardiola hails Real Madrid’s firepower after tense City showdown: You can’t stop them
• Man United revive Antoine Semenyo pursuit as bespoke wingback solution after £70m standoff
• Mbappé and Camavinga doubtful vs Alavés - rival view: crisis brewing at Real Madrid

Conclusion

I’ve been in dressing rooms when a club great questions the manager. It can cut two ways. If the group is fragile, it punctures belief. If the group is stubborn in the right way, it becomes fuel. Amorim’s football is clear, but it needs the right pieces and repetition. That is not a plea for blind patience. It is a call for joined-up thinking. Recruit to the idea, coach to the idea, then judge the idea.

Scholes earned the right to speak his mind, and he touched a nerve that has followed United for a decade: identity. The counter is performance. Fans flagged a strong home run and data that frames the attack more as a finishing and occupation issue than creativity. Those are fixable with coaching and a couple of additions. The club must keep the noise outside and the work inside.

In the end, direction matters more than decibels. If United show a steady line of improvement, this flashpoint becomes a footnote. If they don’t, it will be Exhibit A. The next block of fixtures will tell us which path they are on.